How Random Babbling Becomes Corporate Policy (t3knomanser) wrote,
How Random Babbling Becomes Corporate Policy


I think the root of this entire thing is a confusion as to the purpose and meaning of marriage- on both sides of the fence. So I'm going to approach this from a different angle.

What _is_ marriage? In the eyes of the government, what is it?

There are a few obvious things that it can't be. A governing body has no capacity or responsibility to recognize love; historically love has always been a secondary consideration in marriage for anyone not a peasant. So it's not that. It's not a religious institution, since the government has no power to enforce those.

What it _is_, that I can see is:
  • A contract, that can only be terminated by a process known as divorce.
  • A resource pooling agreement, in which some method is used to distribute resources such that the couple and any dependents are supported
  • A family structure arrangement, in which values are communicated between members, and imparted to any dependants.
  • A recognizable "atomic component"; families are often treated as a single entity by many laws (like tax laws, juvinile crimes).

Is there anything I'm missing? Is there any other purpose marriage serves _in the eyes of the government?_

  • Strange Things People Say About Me (to my face)

    Recently, I've been at the center of a trend. That trend is complete strangers asking me "Are you ____?" A quick summary. For example: Are you…

  • Writer's Block: If I could find my way

    -10,000 years, at minimum. Tomorrow is always better than today, especially when you can't fact-check.

  • Bob Morlang

    When I was working at Tri-Mount, we had these camp trucks. They were army surplus, and while they could take a beating, they only sort of worked. And…

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded