I'm in a snipebitchfest about metasexuality versus monosexuality. It's being amusing. I just realized while replying to a comment from 
beyondbounds that metasexuality is a Neitzchian ubermensch type idea. It really boils out of the same place, and it's one of the few places that the idea of the ubermensch (or the metasexual) as a "going over and a passing under", really makes sense. The going over is that move beyond humanity/sexuality. The removing of the limits that imposes, but in so doing, the meaning behind the term, humanity/sexuality is destroyed; you're moving beyond something that has no meaning. You have both created and subverted in one motion.
I really like that logic.
I'm feeling extra metasexual today. Extra creative. Extra not raedy to work on java yet, but I need to. But there's no book. Suck!
Ah well, as I go, I'll keep y'all abreast of my progress.
beyondbounds that metasexuality is a Neitzchian ubermensch type idea. It really boils out of the same place, and it's one of the few places that the idea of the ubermensch (or the metasexual) as a "going over and a passing under", really makes sense. The going over is that move beyond humanity/sexuality. The removing of the limits that imposes, but in so doing, the meaning behind the term, humanity/sexuality is destroyed; you're moving beyond something that has no meaning. You have both created and subverted in one motion.I really like that logic.
I'm feeling extra metasexual today. Extra creative. Extra not raedy to work on java yet, but I need to. But there's no book. Suck!
Ah well, as I go, I'll keep y'all abreast of my progress.
